Warning: define(): Argument #3 ($case_insensitive) is ignored since declaration of case-insensitive constants is no longer supported in /home/beckytod/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-autoloader/lib/WPAutoloader/AutoLoad.php on line 10
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/beckytod/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-autoloader/lib/WPAutoloader/AutoLoad.php:10) in /home/beckytod/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 8 tuning protocol – techy becky librarian
https://techybeckylibrarian.org
school librarian exploring digital education leadershipTue, 28 Jul 2015 02:05:43 +0000en
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2https://techybeckylibrarian.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-Shot-2017-01-20-at-8.38.43-AM-150x150.pngtuning protocol – techy becky librarian
https://techybeckylibrarian.org
3232My First Tuning Protocol
https://techybeckylibrarian.org/my-first-tuning-protocol/
https://techybeckylibrarian.org/my-first-tuning-protocol/#commentsMon, 27 Jul 2015 03:33:53 +0000http://beckytoddlibrarian.org/?p=568This quarter in the Digital Education Leadership program at Seattle Pacific University I am working on creating an Action Plan to help address a particular challenge that may be preventing a school from realizing their ideal learning environment. In an earlier post, I share the obstacles a school is currently facing in the aftermath of a speedy 1-to-1 laptop rollout. As I formulate the action plan, I have sought feedback from my classmates and professors, working towards a document that can eventually be presented to the school. Part of that feedback took place in a Tuning Protocol, a reflective tool often used by educators seeking constructive criticism. This criticism can be used to “increase student achievement and establish a learning community” (Dearman, et. al, 2005, pg. 636). First developed by Joseph McDonald and David Allen in 1992, the Tuning Protocol was created in order to improve student assessment practices (Blythe, et. al, 1999, pg. 27). The format allows educators to “receive direct and respectful feedback on the problems they present, as well as the opportunity to reflect on the feedback” (McDonald, et. al, 2003).
If you’ve never participated in a Tuning Protocol, it can be a frightening and … Read More
]]>This quarter in the Digital Education Leadership program at Seattle Pacific University I am working on creating an Action Plan to help address a particular challenge that may be preventing a school from realizing their ideal learning environment. In an earlier post, I share the obstacles a school is currently facing in the aftermath of a speedy 1-to-1 laptop rollout. As I formulate the action plan, I have sought feedback from my classmates and professors, working towards a document that can eventually be presented to the school. Part of that feedback took place in a Tuning Protocol, a reflective tool often used by educators seeking constructive criticism. This criticism can be used to “increase student achievement and establish a learning community” (Dearman, et. al, 2005, pg. 636). First developed by Joseph McDonald and David Allen in 1992, the Tuning Protocol was created in order to improve student assessment practices (Blythe, et. al, 1999, pg. 27). The format allows educators to “receive direct and respectful feedback on the problems they present, as well as the opportunity to reflect on the feedback” (McDonald, et. al, 2003).
If you’ve never participated in a Tuning Protocol, it can be a frightening and … Read More
