There’s lots to read on this:
Gary Stager, from 20 years ago http://www.stager.org/articles/edleadership.html and from 25 years ago http://www.stager.org/articles/forkids.html
Never Mind the Laptop – great history of how laptops came to be in schools and where they were successful https://books.google.com/books?id=RE6k6LA8HhoC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false (the book is $3 for full copy on Google Books)
Audrey Watters’ dives into One Laptop Per Child (2012) http://hackeducation.com/2012/04/09/the-failure-of-olpc/
What you end up with after all of this, to summarize, is a struggle: on one side you have devices linked to autonomy and agency and creation and collaboration and all the signifiers and verbs we like in education, and on the other you have standards and metrics and accountability and all of the things measured by formal education. Why are the two not closer together in aims or vision? That’s a good question — for now they are not, and you will need to know what your schools want from giving students computers. I’m sure they *want* both, but what is driving the conversation?
]]>